UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee,v.Marcus Darwyn JONES, also known as Dab, Defendant—Appellant. United States v. Jones, 842 F. App’x 878 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 211 L. Ed. 2d 67, 142 S. Ct. 171 (2021) I am trying to find the facts, issue, analysis, rules, conclusion. I have issues with understanding the wording.

Tell us about a time you used either the Virtue Ethics or Relativism approach to handle a situation? What was the situation? How did you apply your chosen philosophical system? Did it solve the situation? Do you still think this was the right approach? Show clearly you understand the system you chose (Virtue Ethics or […]

Explain and define three major parts of the concept of VIRTUE ETHICS. Pick important factors to help us understand what it is and what makes it different than Consequentialism and Deontology.

Create a brief personal scenario requiring an ethical solution. Make it interesting. 2) Pick an approach under Consequentialism or Deontology and explain why this is the best way to solve the problem. 3) Using the technique, solve the problem. Write thoroughly.

842 Fed.Appx. 878 United States v. Jones, 842 F. App’x 878 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 211 L. Ed. 2d 67, 142 S. Ct. 171 (2021) I am trying to find the Facts, Issues, Analysis, Rules, and Conclusion of this case. I have a general understanding but I mix up the wording