The mission of policing was described by the author as covering 6 key areas: enforcing the law, apprehending offenders, preventing crime, predicting crime, preserving the peace, and providing services. With the advent of various forms of terrorism and transnational crime, the police mission has expanded beyond the traditional borders of burglaries and domestic disputes. Beginning with the material conveyed in the assigned reading and presentation, select 2 scholarly articles from the university criminal justice databases, and integrate those resources to discuss the use of intelligence-led policing (ILP) and the development of fusion centers to equip law enforcement for their expanded mission. Finally, integrate within your discussion the impact of a Judeo-Christian viewpoint on ILP and the development of fusion centers. Your thread is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of Module/Week 3. Your replies are due by 11:59p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the same module/week.

Get Plagiarism-Free and Quality Papers Without Overpaying at Homeworkmavens.com

Solution preview:

Schmalleger (2019) explains that intelligence-led policing (ILP) is a collection and analysis of information to produce an intelligence end product designed to inform police decision making at both the tactical and strategic levels. ILP was first developed to “battle against terrorism and organized and transnational crime” and fusion centers is one way that antiterrorism information is shared (p. 185). According to Schmalleger (2019) fusion centers share and combine information with other intelligence agencies in order to create a broader and more comprehensive “threat picture, locally and nationally” (p. 187). There are currently 78 fusion centers operating in 49 states (Schmalleger, 2019).In an effort to move from reactive policing to a more proactive approach, ILPs gained a lot of momentum after the attacks of 9/11 (Lewandowski et al., 2018).

Although ILP originated as a strategy to combat complex criminality, such as terrorism and organized crime, the information sharing and analytic tenants of ILP are applicable to many of the problems police face (Lewandowski et al., 2018). Now, fusion centers exist to serve as a single point of contact for crime, terrorism, and threat-related information to be received, analyzed, and disseminated to improve situational and operational awareness (Lewandowski et al., 2018). Fusion centers have made it easy for the police to keep track of the suspects, and since fusion centers are regularly updated with suspect’s information, it makes it easy for the police officers to more efficiently carry out their job duties (Lewandowski et al., 2018). However, Lewandowski et al. (2018)argues that fusion centers can be more effectively utilized. According to their studies, frontline personnel and analysts are typically disconnected from fusion centers and many “urban law enforcement agencies are less likely to be familiar with the fusion centers” than rural law enforcement agencies when they are the ones that may benefit from fusion centers the most (p.