DEMONSTRATE ACTIVE ENGAGEMENT IN CRITICAL REFLECTION ON THEIR ABILITY TO UNDERTAKE APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT(S) AND MAINTAIN HOLISTIC PERSPECTIVES AND CULTURAL AWARENESS THROUGH THE THEORETICAL EXAMINATION OF A PARTICULAR NURSING SPECIALTY CASE STUDYJohn Gray, 28 years old, severe depression following suicide attemptMr. John Gray is a 28 year old single male admitted to the unit a week ago after an episode of intentional self-harm. John is the son of a grazier from a farming community north of Brisbane who is expected to take over the family farm. The farm has been severely affected by the longstanding drought conditions in the district.You are the nurse assigned to John’s care for the afternoon shift. On handover you were informed John did not get up for breakfast again, went to lunch reluctantly only because he was compelled to but ate almost nothing, and returned to his bed immediately afterwards.Vital Signs:• Blood pressure 125/75• Temperature 36.3• Pulse 66• Respirations 18.John has a rope burn mark on his neck caused by the breaking of the rope with which he attempted to hang himself and some bruising and broken skin on his arms and legs from the subsequent fall but no serious physical injuries. The areas of broken skin were covered with a non-adherent dressing and tape. The occupational therapist reported John was still choosing not to take part in any activities, including small group games or one-on-one activity.When you go to introduce yourself to John, you find him lying on his bed with the covers pulled up high. He appears reluctant to engage in conversation with you. When you address him to introduce yourself, he grunts and turns over to face the wall away from you.Medications:• Venlafaxine 75 mg bd• Multivitamin once daily• Vitamin B once daily dailyAssessment task 2: Case StudyStudents will be able to demonstrate active engagement in critical reflection on their ability to undertake appropriate assessment(s) and maintain holistic perspectives and cultural awareness through the theoretical examination of a particular nursing specialty case study (on LEO) focusing on the delivery of nursing care, using the clinical reasoning cycle framework and the evidence.Due date: Wednesday,Weighting: 40%Length and/or format: 1600 words /-10% Case study formatPurpose: The case study is designed to allow students the opportunity to demonstrate synthesis of theory and experience acquired in previous and concurrent units while exploring a specific nursing context.Learning outcomes assessed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8How to submit: Student should submit into the appropriate Turnitin drop box located in the assessment block on the LEO site.Return of assignment: Assignments will be marked online and students will be notified via LEO when results and feedback are available.Assessment criteria: Further information pertaining to the case study can be found in the assessment block on LEO. Please refer to the criterion reference rubric.NRSG370 Unit Outline FINAL MODERATED 201760.docx 14Criterion Referenced Rubric: Assessment Task 2, Case StudyCriteria for marking High Distinction (95-100%) High Distinction (85-94%) Distinction (75-84%) Credit (65-74%) Pass (50-64%) Unsatisfactory (31-49%) Unsatisfactory (0-30%)Sequencing 5% The content in the case study directly matches the outline presented in the introductory paragraph. Paragraphs are well organised, and there is a logical progression of ideas so that content flows from one paragraph to the next flawlessly. The case study ends with a rational conclusion. The content in the case study comprehensively matches the outline presented in the introductory paragraph. Paragraphs are organised, and there is a logical progression of ideas so that content flows from one paragraph to the next. The case study ends with a rational conclusion. The content in the case study thoroughly matches the outline presented in the introductory paragraph. Paragraphs are organised in a logical manner so that content flows from one paragraph to the next, and the case study ends with a rational conclusion. The content in the case study matches the outline presented in the introductory paragraph. Most paragraphs are organised in a logical manner so that content flows from one paragraph to the next, and the case study ends with a rational conclusion. The content in the case study mostly matches the outline presented in the introductory paragraph. Most paragraphs are organised in a logical manner, and the case study ends with a rational conclusion. There is a clear introduction, followed by the body of the case study, with a conclusion. However, content within the body and within paragraphs is not always logically sequenced. There is no clear introduction, body and/or conclusion. There is no sequencing evident