In Chapter 4 of the Turnock (2015) text you read about the growth of public health through governmental action and policy. A particular area of interest is in the states police powers, essentially the ability of public health to limit severely or restrict a person’s rights.

In this discussion highlight two scenarios where you believe it is within the ethical and legal boundaries for a public health official to limit someone’s personal freedoms. Support your response with at least one source (does not have to be scholarly) NOTE: You cannot use the smallpox example from the text.
Do you believe this legal ability should remain or is it potentially outdated and invasive? Explain why or why not.