I’m working on a philosophy writing question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn. Moss and Siegler argue that alcoholics should not compete equally with non-alcoholics for liver transplants. Provide one argument that they offer in favor of their view. Then, provide a substantive objection against that argument. Finally, explain whether or not you think that the objection is successful against the argument (that is, state whether or not you think that Moss and Siegler’s argument is fails because of the objection that you provide.)