Police Body Cameras Policy Analysis and Implementation
Police Body Cameras Policy Analysis and Implementation
The current challenges in the police department after complaints of an increase in brutality require new policies. One such policy is the adoption of mandatory body cameras for police throughout the United States. Markedly, the police’s adoption of body cameras will imply extra spending for the state government and formulate procedures for its application. The introduction of body cameras will help the police department reduce the community’s complaints and improve police officers’ and citizens’ relationships. An analysis of the implementation of mandatory body cameras for the police, its importance, and implications will help achieve the police department’s goals and citizens’ confidence in their functions.
Implementation of the Policy
The police chief will be responsible for the implementation of the mandatory body cameras for the police. The implementation will commence with a pilot study for three months, where 50 police officers will use body cameras. A single body camera set costs approximately $60, and the cost of its maintenance per month is approximately $20. The 50 police will use body cameras and serve throughout the locality, such as traffic stops and stores (Treen, 2015). The implementation will also involve assessing the body cameras to determine their efficacy by retrieving recordings from the cameras’ memory storage and analyzing the battery capacity. The police department will collect police officers’ views and review constitutional provisions on privacy in implementing mandatory body cameras for police officers (Dhana, 3015).
Importance of the Policy
The implementation of the policy for mandatory body cameras among police officers will result in multiple benefits for the community and police department. First, body cameras will ensure accountability in the police’s conduct since it will allow for easy retrieval of evidence. Second, mandatory body cameras will shorten the justice process because the police will easily present evidence before the court during cases (Joyce & Murray, 2017). Third, body cameras will improve the community and the police’s relationship because of reduced police brutality or crimes against humanity. Lastly, the use of mandatory body cameras will augment the police department’s efforts to track criminal activities because the cameras will capture additional information that police memory or witnesses cannot provide (Conner, 2017).
Efficacy of the Policy
The implementation of mandatory body cameras for the police will result in a positive relationship between the police department and the community. The body cameras will ensure police officers remain accountable for acts that constitute law breakages, such as brutality or extra-judicial offenses. Consequently, police will follow legal procedures in apprehending criminals by following laid-down procedures and a peaceful approach (Conner, 2017). Thus, the community will improve its relationship with the police department because it will trust police officers to protect them and prevent law breakage peacefully. Moreover, body cameras will contribute to evidence gathering that will ease litigation’s legal processes, significantly reducing crime levels in the community (Dhana, 3015).
Evaluation of the Policy
The policy’s efficacy in reducing police brutality levels and increasing justice provision will undergo an evaluation through regular analysis. In particular, the policy’s implementation will face review within every two weeks during the three months of the pilot phase (Joyce & Murray, 2017). The evaluation will involve reviewing the details from the police body cameras’ memory cards to determine their conduct. The evaluation will also track court cases within the three months of the pilot phase to determine which one influences police body cameras (Treen, 2015). As a result, the evaluation will assess the policy’s intricacy in promoting peace and order in the community through legal apprehension of suspects and criminals’ conviction.
Effects of the Implementation of the Policy on the Police’s Culture
The implementation of the mandatory body cameras for the police will influence the police department, either positively or negatively. Primarily, the policy will improve the conduct of the police positively by increasing levels of accountability. The police will adopt less forceful approaches when apprehending suspects, including those who counter peaceful arrest (Joyce & Murray, 2017). Moreover, applying the policy will improve the police department’s commitment to providing equal treatment to community members. As a result, the police will operate under the law’s confines and maintain equality in implementing a new culture of fairness and service to all citizens (Conner, 2017).
The policy’s implementation may also result in some police officers adopting negative qualities that develop an undesirable culture for the police department. Markedly, implementing the policy will result in some officers tampering with information from the body cameras (Dhana, 3015). Besides, some police officers will falsely manipulate footage from the body cameras that will lower the provision of care and justice by the department (Treen, 2015). As a result, the police may hinder the justice process by the provision of false evidence. Some police may exploit the advantage of body cameras by turning them off and committing extra-judicial expenses.
In conclusion, adopting the police’s mandatory body cameras will improve the relationship between the police department and the community. The policy requires an analysis to determine its intricacy and conduct that will result in either positive or negative application. Thus, the police chief must conduct a pilot to apply the policy within the community positively.
Conner, K. (2017, March 15). City to discuss police body cameras. Hays Daily News. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from https://eds-b-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=719af011-d654-477c-b037-4928f9d77652%40pdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=2W61972384486&db=nfh
Dhana, S. (3015, September 3). LAPD body camera policy needs revision. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from https://go-gale-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ps/i.do?p=STND&u=canyonuniv&id=GALE|A427640798&v=2.1&it=r&sid=ebsco
Joyce, J., & Murray, A. (2017, April). The future of law enforcement. KM World, 12-24. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from https://eds-b-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=febf8dda-2450-4bba-8d36-8a7f3c12a660%40sessionmgr103
Treen, D. (2015, September 7). Cost an issue, but police see benefits in body cameras. Florida Times-Union. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from https://go-gale-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ps/i.do?p=STND&u=canyonuniv&id=GALE|A427910205&v=2.1&it=r&sid=ebsco