How did the practicum expose, neutralize, or overcome cognitive limitations that otherwise might have hindered objective analysis of the subject?
What key thing(s) did you take away from the SAT practicum?
Are there any aspects of this particular SAT—the theory behind it, its role in the research process, how it should be executed, or its benefit to policymakers—that you still do not understand?
How might you apply this technique—or elements of it—in your profession?
Were there any portions of the practicum that were unclear? What portions would you change, if any, to make it more effective?